Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/AMA Alerts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Redirect. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/The Thadman. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 03:27, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Association of Members' Advocates/AMA Alerts
The alerts system of the defunct AMA. -- Wikiwoohoo (talk) 01:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete while the AMA deserves to be tagged historical as a useless failed project, looking at the history of this subpage, it had no use, and not much in the history. Secret account 01:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete although harmless it is also useless. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep or redirect to main AMA page - Another important indicator of how a page is/was useful is what links to it. In this case, severaal pages link to Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/AMA Alerts, including a request for adminship, several talk page archives, and a few records of AMA meetings. I can think of no reason to break those links, and no reason to delete the page history. Graham 87 04:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This doesn't have much of a history to keep it though Secret account 18:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Forty-seven edits is a very significant amount of history, considering that each page on Wikipedia has an average of about 18 edits. Graham 87 04:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.