Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Association of Wikipedian semi-nerds who pride themselves in doing absolutely nothing with any sort of meaning or logic whatsoever, despite popular belief


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Not funny enough for BJAODN. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 13:16, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Association of Wikipedian semi-nerds who pride themselves in doing absolutely nothing with any sort of meaning or logic whatsoever, despite popular belief

 * I'm not sure what to do with this. BJAODN? Transwiki to Uncyclopedia? Delete? In any case, this can't be kept. This could be construed as speediable under CSD G1 and G3, and depending on view, this may be breaking a few policies WP:NPA, WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL, WP:WQT depending on the view point. Karmafist 07:51, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is not funny enough for BJAODN. &mdash; J I P | Talk 12:12, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to /dev/null. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 12:44, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete into the abyss per JIP. Unfunny, useless. Xoloz 17:22, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unfunny, which is too bad - the title has such potential. --Carnildo 00:08, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Reviewing the history, this was mildly funny back when it was first created (late March). It fell into disuse after about 2 weeks and sat neglected.  On 26 Oct, it was found by anon users who have ...  Well, I'm not sure that you can use the word "vandalized" on this page, but they sure didn't add to it's clarity.  Or it's humor.  If this were a current joke page being maintained by reputable editors, I might give it the benefit of doubt.  As it is, delete as a no-longer-relevant joke that's become vandal-bait.  Rossami (talk) 00:21, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing funny here.  It borders on patent nonsense. --Idont Havaname 03:10, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN this revision of the article, then delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  10:20, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * What he said. N (t/c) 00:05, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, could be offensive for some Wikipedians. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 07:39, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Me: you guys are a bunch of wankers. That's what. Learn to apperciate life and its randomness, for christ's sakes. ''- unsigned comment by anon user: 64.180.240.190
 * Delete as vandalism. This is Wikipedia, not MAD Magazine! B.Wind 21:06, 6 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.