Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Attack sites


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Close --  Nick  t  15:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Attack sites
This is an essay that really belongs in userspace, not in Wikipedia space. It has been abused by its author, who has cited it as if it were policy when going around altering others' talk and project page comments, editing closed AfDs, etc. *Dan T.* 14:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Move to userspace. It's perfectly valid as an essay of the author's opinion, but in the Wikipedia space it is subject to misuse as an alleged policy, and has been done so by the author to justify things like altering a closed AfD and editing various others' comments on talk pages. *Dan T.* 14:16, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy close Project space has loads of essays, if you don't like that, then propose a policy to remove them all. If this essay is being abused, then deal with the abuse, MfD is not an alternative to RfC and Arbcom.--Docg 14:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Valid essay like any other. Nominator is by their own admission an active contributor to an attack/hate site, which would be affected by this essay. Conflict of interest. - Denny  ( talk ) 14:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy close per Doc G. This is a rather misconceived nomination in my view. -- ChrisO 14:41, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.