Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Autofixing cites

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  userfy and mark as failed proposal. --BDD (talk) 15:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Autofixing cites


Not sure how to classify this; a failed proposal perhaps for another approach to broken refs. But there was no interest in it, the templates were TfD and userfied, and without them it's a confusing mess with the examples broken and unlikely ever to be fixed. Could be marked as historical or a failed proposal but as it was never adopted or seriously considered probably deletion/userfication is best. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 14:51, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Userfy, linked in several places. Graham 87 04:15, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Userfy and mark as failed proposal We've decided that autofixing isn't a good thing. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.