Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Awkward Questions

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. RL0919 (talk) 06:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Awkward Questions

 * – (View MfD)

Delete Created by, a newbie user who announced they were retiring. Whatever use this has, it's already covered by WP:HELP DESK. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:42, 27 December 2019 (UTC)


 * I’m not retiring.  E Super Maker (😲 shout) 01:48, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * You said differently on RK's page. But that's really besides the point anyway. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:49, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with above. This could also cause arguments. --Bduke (talk) 02:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Redirect. to Help desk to just sweep it under the rug. Also, I seriously hope you don't retire. } &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 02:42, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - while created in good faith, this seems to be redundant to WP:TEA/WP:VP/WP:HELPDESK, and may encourage WP:NOTFORUM behaviour., while I can see you're enthusiastic about Wikipedia, you've been spending a lot of time in the "backstage" areas of Wikipedia like templates and meta-pages, which isn't the best way for a new user to learn how the encyclopedia works. Why not try editing some more articles? SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 02:46, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * That might not be a good suggestion in this case. I'd rather say that this user would be best served by finishing since they're more on the tech-side of things. At the very least, they should join us in WP:Discord!! :D  &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 02:55, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Poor advice and pointless. Johnuniq (talk) 02:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, or userfy if the author wants the record of the code, per nom. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, which may also be an answer to what to do with the hypothetical bots. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:46, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.