Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:BJAONDN

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus.  bibliomaniac 1  5  06:10, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:BJAONDN

 * – (View MfD)

This seems to be a revival of the deleted BJAODN pages. I'm relatively new here, but from what I understand, there are GFDL/CC-BY-SA problems, as well as concerns that these types of pages may encourage vandalism. Catgirllover4ever (talk) 20:53, 26 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete I declined a request for speedy deletion of this page on the basis of previous deletions by discussion. Too unclear whether this is a duplicate of previous pages or not. However, I support its deletion and suggest the name be salted as well. -- MelanieN (talk) 21:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. The main reason for the deletion of BJAODN was that it encouraged vandalism. This page is specifically restricted to content that for various reasons was not deleted (e.g. edit summaries, talk page comments, project-space content), so there's no content here that would encourage the vandalism of articles. (There was one section that was BJAODN material, i.e. reverted mainspace vandalism, which I deleted.) In addition, all content is properly linked for attribution purposes, so I don't think anything is a copyright violation. (If there are copyright problems, fixing them should be trivial due to the page's small size.) TL;DR: the arguments for deleting BJAODN do not apply here. — python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 16:17, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete what seems to be a random collection of silly diffs. Drmies (talk) 16:20, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Per pythoncoder. -- Puddleglum 2.0 (How's my driving?) 22:32, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * User:Puddleglum2.0, I wish you could explain [{U|pythoncoder}}'s rationale, since I cannot follow it at all (and so obviously I cannot understand yours either). Drmies (talk) 22:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I believe what s/he is trying to say is that this page does not encourage vandalism because none of it is deleted, and that all.of the content is properly attributed, so to clean up copyvio problems would be easy due also to this pages small size. I personally don't find this page entertaining; like you I think it's just silly diffs, but I also know that others may find it funny and there aren't any real problems with it. Thats how I interpret the rationale anyway, hope this helps. =) also, here's another ping to, I don't think yours went through. Cheers, -- Puddleglum 2.0 (How's my driving?) 23:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete random collection of diffs. Probably suitable for a section of a user page. Peter James (talk) 07:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per pythoncoder. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:06, 3 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.