Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:BOTCH

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Speedy delete per author request, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:38, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

BOTCH


Almost all links come from the Humor navbox, with maybe one or two links elsewhere in 3+ years. I fail to see how this is humor. I also don't see anywhere that this essay was ever pushed. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 05:57, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't find that essay particularly useful; I think it's definitely a stretch calling it humor.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 06:19, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G7 As the sole contributor of [significant] content, I don't even remember writing this (though I suppose it was three years ago). It looks incomplete, the edit summaries I used seem to agree with that, I can't remember where it was supposed to be heading and I thoroughly disagree with the content as is. G7 please. --Dweller (talk) 08:26, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * So this attempt at wisdom was a complete botch? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:50, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Possibly. Let's say there are other things I've written round here I'm more proud of. Next uninvolved admin here, please close this. --Dweller (talk) 13:07, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.