Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Bayesian HARA

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. signed,Rosguill talk 22:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Bayesian HARA

 * – (View MfD)

Insufficient information, in wrong namespace, with no indication of notability or sourcing. — Jeff G. ツ 18:34, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Draftify - Draft space is the right namespace for pages that are inappropriately in project space and do not satisfy notability. It would be better to draftify them before they are nominated for deletion, but once they are nominated for deletion, they say that they should not be moved until the XFD is closed.  Robert McClenon (talk) 21:05, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete in favour of its copy in User:Schwalb edward/sandbox. Advise the author, User:Schwalb edward, to begin as an editor by improving existing content related to their interest, and to not jump straight in to writing a new page. He needs to learn the ropes.  At the moment, he seems to have no read WP:NOR. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:42, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per SmokeyJoe. Best to be clear that this is not a punishment with the deletion rationale—merely being housekeeping—as it could seem like it is punitive.  J 947 &thinsp;(c) , at  03:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete/Selective merge, as required, into the sandboxed copy, per above. Doug Mehus T · C  21:11, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.