Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Beerhouse

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  06:43, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Beerhouse

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

An unfunny duplication of WP:TEA. It's obviously not meant to be a serious page, so presumably its only potential value is WP:HUMOR. Personally, I don't find anything about this page to be funny or clever, and it could potentially be confusing to a new user who stumbles upon it. (This nomination includes all of the subpages of this page as well.)  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 21:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete bizarre, pointless, and confusing, especially in light of the Traveller’s Pub over at Wikivoyage. Looks like a sandbox that got way out of hand. Dronebogus (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom. Userfy maybe, but must not look like it does in projectspace. SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Teahouse (which would be a bit humorous). — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 22:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * No, it wouldn’t. Nobody is going to search for this so it’s pointless. Dronebogus (talk) 22:37, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * It may have other uses; e.g. one might link it in addition to (or incorporate it into) beer welcome or even use it with free beer. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 22:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * That’s a WP:TNT solution, so deletion without recreation prejudice is fine. Dronebogus (talk) 23:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose (Creator of page) So unfunny humor means it needs to be deleted? How is this hurting anybody? Support moving to userspace Lallint  ⟫⟫⟫  Talk  23:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Did you even read the arguments? It’s not just considered unfunny, it’s also confusing to new users. Dronebogus (talk) 23:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Then why nominate it for deletion, why not just move it to userpace? Lallint  ⟫⟫⟫  Talk  23:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * What value would it have to Wikipedia if it's in user space? Why not delete it if its only value is to confuse new users?  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 00:45, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, has no value to WP. --  P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Borderline G3. – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk | contribs) 05:52, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.