Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Books/FATHER OF SAIYANS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was delete Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 14:25, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Books/FATHER OF SAIYANS
Makes no sense, its not really a book. I don't want to be CREEPy, but me thinks we need a deletion policy on the wikibooks if they are not in userspace. Cerejota (talk) 21:44, 28 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment See related discussion at Administrators'_noticeboard. Cenarium (talk) 22:00, 28 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment The request is for a policy? If there is no deletion guideline currently at all, it is hard for me to see a reason to delete.  Now if the item were offensive in some way to WP, I would ask that such a reason be stated.  "Not really a book" however does not work for me. "Common Sense" is a tract -- but I suggest that calling it "not a book" would not make it improper for the newspace. Collect (talk) 22:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)


 * It is not a request for policy. It is a discussion to develop a consensus for deleting Books/FATHER OF SAIYANS because it makes no sense, and its not really a book. I could understand (but disagree) with you not accepting this as a valid reason for deletion, but barring the emergence of a policy, this discussion should proceed, on that basis. My comment seems to have been WP:BEANy... I just was trying to say that I know we have no policy for deletion of the Books, but we should delete this one anyways as not being a coherent book. Policy is not established in the abstract, it is a result of discussions such as this one...--Cerejota (talk) 23:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - contents do not make a coherent whole. MER-C 02:26, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, as the subject is too restricted and the title makes no sense (only one google hit, the MFD page, for FATHER OF SAIYANS), it cannot be a sustainable book. The content added by Uncle G should be added to a book on Dragon Ball or Saiyan. Cenarium (talk) 16:11, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - looks like a test by a single-edit user. Uncle G is capable themselves to edit a book under a reasonable title. "Title makes no sense (only one google hit)" is not valid argument, since we don't know the intentions of the author: it is reasonable to expect that a unique title is a "selling feature" of the book. What is more, if only title is bad, then the solution is to move, not to delete. - 7-bubёn >t 18:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The title is supposed to be the subject of the book... Cenarium (talk) 14:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.