Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Books/new stadiums in Bulgaria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Delete Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 22:25, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Books/new stadiums in Bulgaria
Seems to be an editing test, should be deleted or userfied. Cerejota (talk) 08:16, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or Userfy. But did you ask User:JuriTzolov before bringing the MfD?  This might have been G7ed or moved without bringing in other editors. THF (talk) 08:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No reason to have this as an article, so no reason to have it in any other way. Nyttend (talk) 15:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment This book is also the subject of a discussion currently running at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion, over whether there should be a speedy deletion criterion expressly relating to Wikipedia books. Please see there.  Nyttend (talk) 15:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as G2&mdash;test page. The page was probably created for test purposes as is indicated by a comment. Ruslik (talk) 19:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy and then delete, It seems like a personal thing to me, so a user subpage would make much more sense. However it also falls into the useless category, and as a book, it has no contents, and could just be a plain page. I think that in the Books: space there should only be content that could be useful to someone. So where the contents fail to match the title that would be a reason for it to go. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Move to user space Userfy and delete this - This belongs in the user space should be userfied, doesn't belong in this area. Versus22 talk 03:48, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy and Delete Doesn't belong in project space. §hep  Talk  06:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Question What is the point of userfying if we delete thereafter ? Cenarium (talk) 18:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * We delete in mainspace but since the content was a test, we place it in the author's userspace as courtesy. Perhaps there is some valid content that could eventually makes it way back into mainspace in some other form. Perhaps we don't want to make a new user feel like his or her hard work was in vain. Etc.--Cerejota (talk) 20:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It is easy to decide that this does not belong in Book: space but more tricky in user space. It seems to be common here that something is userfied, and then when the user does nothing it comes up for deletion later.  In this case if the stadiums were built, or even seriously planned and funded then the pictures could be used.  And the text coule be altered to something like an article. But the chances are that this is fiction and will not result in an article, so it will be eventually deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:BITE comes to mind. WP:ARS also. But mostly WP:CRYSTAL. :D --Cerejota (talk) 00:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.