Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Books/yeah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. PhilKnight (talk) 08:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Books/yeah
Failed CSD, so doing MfD. Books says that:

"A meaningful title helps other users to have the correct expectation regarding the content of a book."

This article doesn't seems to have a meaningful topic. Contains only one article (ie redundant). In other words, not what a WikiBook should be, as per the WikiBook page itself. Cerejota (talk) 06:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Nonsense. I downloaded this "book" and all it was was a mirror of the "upload file" page. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:36, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Now marked again for speedy Beeblebrox (talk) 06:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment: Since the feature was implemented a few day ago, and different users have been experimenting with it, there are a few pages listed in Category:Wikipedia:Books that do not have "A meaningful title". There is further discussion on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 06:42, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * There is already a discussion there. However, CSD G## cover all content not specifically excluded, and these are content. Furthermore, the consensus, albeit early, is leaning towards explicit affirmation Hell, they cover images in en-wiki! However, CSD was denied by an admin, so here we are.--Cerejota (talk) 06:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.