Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/nothingbot

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Bots/Requests for approval/nothingbot


Not a live BRFA. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I removed the cat. I don't think there's anything against letting untranscluded BRFAs exist if users want to fill in details and submit later. May 23 wasn't that long ago. Why don't we ask Nothing7898 if they plan to do anything with it? If not, they can G7 it. — Earwig   talk  18:18, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Decline. Just as MfD is not a place for policy debate, and my longstanding position that MfD should not entertain deletion of ArbCom pages without at least ArbCom clerk input, I don't think MfD should be used for deletion of Bots pages.  Bots are a very important, delicate and technical matter.  Either it is a WP:CSD#G7 matter, or please have a BAG member (Bot Approvals Group) make the case for deletion.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:54, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.