Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:COLBERT

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete. --RL0919 (talk) 21:27, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

COLBERT
Catch phrase is insufficient to meet WP:ESSAYS and would be better in a userbox. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 05:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Klein zach  07:01, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete-- per nom. -- E♴  (talk)  16:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep nothing in the essay that violates WP:ESSAYS. All delete votes are inconsistent with policy and should be ignored. The fact that it is currently a one sentence stub is not a valid reason for deletion. -Atmoz (talk) 18:56, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Userfy, at present. I'd prefer we just userfy all our essays and be done with it, but that's not the way Wikipedia works. Buddy431 (talk) 20:15, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not a useful page for building an encyclopedia, and not particularly humorous either.  &mdash;SW&mdash; comment 20:35, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not useful for encyclopedia like Wikipedia, and as commented by nom, would better fit in as an userbox. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:02, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.