Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 January 15/Change in consensus on Northern Ireland

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was move post to Categories for discussion/Log/2009 January 15 and redirected there. If you feel the redirect should be deleted, the correct venue would be RfD. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 22:27, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Categories for discussion/Log/2009 January 15/Change in consensus on Northern Ireland


I don't think this page is needed. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0  07:42, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's hard to understand what's going on here, but it seems like someone complaining that a CFD didn't go their way. No reason not to remove; provides nothing and is an inappropriate use of WP: namespace. Achowat (talk) 12:56, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't simply delete. It is a fair post.  It is in a weird place.  Move it somewhere.  Maybe WT:CfD.  Maybe its authors talkpage.  I see that he is banned for another couple of months.  The nominator is still expected to notify him.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:13, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Move Delete - User:MickMacNee created the page and has been banned from editing Wikipedia by the Arbitration Committee unti 4 August 2012, at which time the ban becomes an indefinite ban until such time as he demonstrates to the Committee that he is no longer a threat to the collaborative nature of the project. The information on the page doesn't seem bad, so I would not object to moving it to User:MickMacNee/Change in consensus on Northern Ireland per SmokeyJoe and tagged with Essay if it does not counter the purpose behind the user being banned by the Arbitration Committee. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC) Move Per Cunard's move suggestion below. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 08:23, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep cited the post at the link in his CfD nomination at Categories for discussion/Log/2009 January 15. Because it provides relevant background for the CfD nomination, it should not be deleted. I support moving the post into Categories for discussion/Log/2009 January 15 and then redirecting the page to the CfD. Cunard (talk) 19:25, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with Cunard's move suggestion (move to into or below the CfD discussion to which it is relevant). I don't think we need a redirect, however. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 07:18, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with it too. With or without a redirect too. It could also be histmerged to Categories for discussion/Log/2009 January 15 (if possible). Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0  08:33, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: Relisting as creator was never notified (and nominator didn't ask for an admin to do the notification since the talk page is edit protected right now). This has now happened.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 01:43, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - MfD notification is only required if, "If nominating a page from someone else's userspace, notify them on their main talk page". -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 08:23, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Notifying the sole author of a page should be required. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't see any reason to notify a banned user, who can't edit his talk page. We don't want him to create sockpuppets to take part in this discussion. Right? Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0  11:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * SmokeyJoe's suggestion is a good guideline. However, it is unsound in this case because the user talk page is fully protected and because of Arbitration/Requests/Case/MickMacNee. Because MickMacNee cannot participate in the discussion (without engaging in sockpuppetry or requesting a user to engage in WP:PROXYING for him), notification of him is not required before this MfD comes to a conclusion. Cunard (talk) 18:17, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I maintain that MickMacNee should be notified before his then valid contribution gets deleted. Whether this is purely for procedural record keeping, or for his talk page watchers, or in the expectation that he may be soon welcomed backed, or erring on the side of politeness, is not the point. The point is that notification of stakeholders is important. I thank NihonJoe for making the talk page notification. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:32, 13 July 2012 (UTC)


 * support Cunard's solution. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.