Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Transclusion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep as. — xaosflux  Talk  16:35, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Categories for discussion/Transclusion
Proposal has been adopted. Minimal discussion on talk page is not worth keeping. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC) The proposal has been unadopted, so I'm going to tag it as historical in case it can be used in the future. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:40, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Tag as historical Not worth deleting at this point.  MBisanz  talk 02:09, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, db-author. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  03:35, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagging as historical does not make sense and is confusing. This is a sandbox to work on WP:CFD. Just look at thw history. If it is to be kept, a history merge with CFD would be the most logical course. Sandboxes aren't usually tagged as historical. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  16:09, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Tag as historical per MBisanz (talk · contribs). Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 14:51, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Tag as historical - Like what was done with all of the other unadopted and old WP pages and per MrKia. -- Dom the dude 001 02:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.