Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Citizendium workgroups, Wikipedia WikiProjects, and watchlists

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Tagged historical. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:15, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Citizendium workgroups, Wikipedia WikiProjects, and watchlists


Reason for proposed deletion: We are not citizendium. If there are relevant workgroups, they should be hosted off-site and not in wiki namespace rather than promoting the use of Citizendium for collaboration. This page has few links to it (8, I think), and a total of 9 edits in its 4-year history. [Relisted. 103.6.159.75 (talk) 16:03, 12 December 2015 (UTC)] --Tom (LT) (talk) 10:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. WikiProject Citizendium Porting (WP:CZPORT) was started in June 2009. More information is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Citizendium Porting/Archive 1.  Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Citizendium Porting was started and closed in June 2009.  I started Citizendium workgroups, Wikipedia WikiProjects, and watchlists (WP:CZWPW) in September 2010 as a reference for editors in WP:CZPORT.  Citizendium has information at CZ:Reusing Citizendium Content - Citizendium.  Counts of incoming links and of edits to a page are irrelevant to the validity of its existence.
 * —Wavelength (talk) 16:36, 10 September 2014 (UTC) and 19:12, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * delete or mark as historic. The project is inactive and even it weren’t Citizendium is effectively dead, with the only activity one editor compiling a dictionary and pronunciation guide in its pages. The content of the site is so out of date that it is of no use to WP. None of the projects listed are active there, if they ever were. As such this is only of historic interest.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 21:14, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment This MFD was not transcluded to the WP:MFD page. I have just did that. 103.6.159.75 (talk) 15:28, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * comment. Thanks. I did not notice that, nor that my contribution above was so long after the MfD creation. I think this shows the problem with the page up for deletion; without it being transcluded only people reading the page could see it was up for deletion, and that happens so rarely, probably only by accident, that it happened only twice in over a year. I.e. it is of no current interest, only of historic value.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 15:50, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Wavelength must have come to the know of this mfd due to the talk page notification. That aside, the page has been viewed 274 times in just the last 3 months. 103.6.159.75 (talk) 16:06, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.