Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Clean Energy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Daniel (talk) 04:37, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Clean Energy
All comments except IP's first contribution expressing skepticism about the page's purpose. It can only lead to a rambling and divisive discussion if anything, and it is entirely outside the scope of building an encyclopedia. Delete per WP:SOAP. --Storkk (talk) 09:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: if deleted, it should of course be de-linked from Template:Announcements/Community bulletin board. --Storkk (talk) 09:38, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Not sure if this page is appropriate or not, but if not, then don't delete, but mark as historical and protect if necessary. Does Wikipedia have a position on things like "Clean energy".  This could evolve into a meaningful essay.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:39, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Whatever it is or isn't, I have a hard time using the word "historical" to describe this page. Besides which, historical pages are usually kept for posterity, to show their impact on the history of the project. This has had no discernible impact, and I don't see how it would ever have the potential to do so. --Storkk (talk) 17:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I see your point. Perhaps it should be moved into User:Djbaniel's userspace?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 19:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Had User:Djbaniel actually contributed to the contents of the page, apart from simply instantiating it, I would certainly agree... but why userfy something where the user concerned has had no input whatsoever? Then again, userfication would cause no harm that I could see, so I'd support it. --Storkk (talk) 23:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Pointless, possibly disruptive, absolutely no need for it.  This isn't the place for such a discussion.  --UsaSatsui (talk) 05:21, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Page was created yesterday.. you couldn't wait to get a response from the author? We don't even know what this is exactly about. -- Ned Scott 08:46, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Pull from Template:Announcements/Community bulletin board, where the creator has commented "No pull date for now due to potential importance". Nifboy (talk) 09:03, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. -- Quiddity (talk) 20:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SOAP, especially as it's in the announcements box. -- Escape Artist Swyer Talk to me The mess I've made 18:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or userfy per above. -- Quiddity (talk) 20:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't figure out what the page is for, but I think it violates WP:SOAP. --Carnildo (talk) 20:45, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.