Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was nomination withdrawn. Kimchi.sg 21:54, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Cleaning up vandalism
The page is just a copy of Counter-Vandalism Unit. Since this page seems to be much less active than WP:CVU, it might as well just be deleted and redirected to WP:CVU.-- Rouge Rosado  Oui?  20:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - these look to be two different pages, to me. This is suggestions for people to consider if they want to deal with vandalism; the CVU is one of those methods, a group of people who deal with vandalism. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Thomasmeeks 21:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep.  This site looks more user friendly.  Possibly merge.


 * Note, I've asked the nominator to consider withdrawing this, in light of all the debate that I think they may have missed when this came up in the WP:CVU debates. . — xaosflux  Talk  01:02, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - This page has some valid points for editors who are not members of the CVU. —Cswrye 18:23, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and delete Counter-Vandalism Unit. -- Cyde Weys  18:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Changed vote to keep - Since most of the users who have commented claim that this page serves a unique purpose, I change my vote to keep.-- Rouge Rosado  Oui?  20:16, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.