Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Diffs are for Stiffs

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Diffs are for Stiffs


Another useless page from the growing list of essays created by User:Siuenti. The user marks all of them as "humorous" to prevent them from being deleted, but their content is just pure bitterness, not humour. This user has been chronically obsessed with their bitterness about Wikipedia, about the reactions they get from editors and admins, and the majority of their edits has been centered around this personal obsession (while showing no sign of understanding Wikipedia policies and guidelines). This essay is not an exception—there is no useful advice for other people or anything funny about it, it is just their very specific personal grudge against the specific editors and admins they have interacted with. Siuenti has already been blocked for creating useless essays and their disruptive behaviour. J. M. (talk) 14:01, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as a silly and pointless "funny" essay that doesn't really convey anything valuable to the project. Creator is blocked for 2 weeks I see, where would be the place to go to pursue a block on creating future essays? ValarianB (talk) 19:42, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * See WP:BAN—from the description, I'm not sure if a topic ban or an article ban is the right choice...J. M. (talk) 23:23, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete A humorous tag should not be a shield that prevents deletion of an unhelpful essay. The essay has no humor and no useful advice—it is just noise, useful only to deflect opponents who might express disagreement on an article talk page. The background is not relevant but for anyone curious, see WT:Verifiability, and the background for that which includes here and here. Johnuniq (talk) 23:09, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Odd. Remotely possibly interesting, but still odd, it may be ok in userspace but definitely not in projectspace. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - netierh funny nor helpful from a project standpoint. -- Whpq (talk) 17:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.