Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links/New York villages within towns/Adams

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  keep, with all made into redirects to Disambiguation pages with links/New York villages within towns which is not a part of this discussion. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation pages with links/New York villages within towns/Adams

 * ( DexDor(talk) 15:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC) )
 * ( DexDor(talk) 15:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC) )
 * ( DexDor(talk) 15:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC) )
 * ( DexDor(talk) 15:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC) )
 * ( DexDor(talk) 15:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC) )
 * ( DexDor(talk) 15:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC) )
 * ( DexDor(talk) 15:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC) )
 * ( DexDor(talk) 15:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC) )
 * ( DexDor(talk) 15:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC) )
 * ( DexDor(talk) 15:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC) )
 * ( DexDor(talk) 15:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC) )
 * ( DexDor(talk) 15:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC) )
 * ( DexDor(talk) 15:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC) )

These are database reports from 2010-2012. They don't appear to have any historical importance that requires keeping in "live" Wikipedia (cluttering up what-links-here, categories etc). DexDor(talk) 09:22, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The decision to move these was not without some disagreement, which still pops up from time to time. I think at minimum the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation pages with links/New York villages within towns needs to be retained somehow. older ≠ wiser 09:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * We could keep that page and turn the subpages into redirects to it. DexDor(talk) 14:04, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The point of creating these pages at the time was merely to note whatever incoming links pointed to the pages. I have no objection to either delinking them (so they no longer cause link load) or redirecting them to the main discussion. As long as the pages exist in some form, their content will remain in the edit history for anyone who needs to know. bd2412  T 15:07, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.