Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Do not ruin the weeds

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete. per CSD G3. Obvious troll. Blocked as such. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:53, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Do not ruin the weeds


Created as a policy earlier today (not actually a policy, so I removed the tag); blatant misrepresentation of established policies (cf Administrators). DannyS712 (talk) 18:33, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, I get it! This is supposed to be a policy to prevent the blocking of LTA's by inhibiting admins like from blocking more than three accounts a day, and the author/vandal who wrote it is named weed. Interesting stuff! Delete. &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 19:00, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Sometimes I think we should really have a PROD process for all namespaces. (Although any troll might just remove it anyway.) Fairly obvious delete, although maybe archive for humor (such as a move to WP:Silly Things) if felt appropriate. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 19:09, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - If this were a proposed policy, it would be worth considering and rejecting. The author is probably a sockpuppet for a blocked user. Give her some puppets to sock on.  The SPI can wait, because that requires identifying the knitter of the socks.  Robert McClenon (talk) 19:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Blatant hoax. -- Thegooduser  Life Begins With a Smile :)  🍁 21:17, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just nonsense.  Apart from anything else, it would break WP:SPI, where there it is not uncommon to find a dozen puppets of one sockmaster. --  Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 00:18, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - Exactly, User:BrownHairedGirl. Perhaps the human behind the account had 5 or more accounts previously blocked at one shot.  The exact number doesn't matter.  This probably involves sockpuppetry.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:17, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - The project page is a policy. It is a policy because I say it is. I don't care if you remove the policy template. - Weed132 (talk | contribs) 22:41, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.