Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't-give-a-fuckism (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy keep per fast consensus and lack of a reason to delete.  Syn  ergy 13:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Don't-give-a-fuckism
Orion11M87 (talk) 02:05, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment No deletion reason is given. The MfD before was speedy kept since no reason was given. Possible SNOW. --mboverload @  03:11, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * In spite of the stunning deletion reason, I'm going to have to say keep. BJ Talk 02:19, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: I don't give a fuck. seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  02:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Meh Mr.Z-man 02:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Can someone explain in detail about why is it so encyclopedic? — Orion11M87 (talk) 02:35, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It does not need to be encyclopedic, because it is in what is called "Wikipedia space" or "project space", and it is clearly flagged as an essay. At the top of the page is a "nutshell" that reads "This is an essay, a page containing the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. You may heed it or not, at your discretion." Its presence in Wikipedia space for over 2 years is in keeping with our policy on essays. I hope this helps.  Risker (talk) 02:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * SPEEDY Keep I am totally serious when I say that I abide by this. This is an important page to me, please do not delete it.  On first look it seems like deletable nonsense, but it has a good message. How do I keep a neutral head on the Sarah Palin talk page?  I seriously don't give a fuck if she wins or not. In real life I may give a fuck, but here, not at all.--mboverload @  02:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep It's great advice. -- Ned Scott 03:08, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Maybe even per WP:SNOW. I don't see a compelling argument to delete. -Phoenixrod (talk) 03:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Anybody who votes on this clearly does give a fuck about it, or else they'd not be interested enough to vote, would they? *Dan T.* (talk) 03:14, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I give a fuck about not giving a fuck =) --mboverload @ 03:19, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note I may have not give a fuck, but the mfd had replaced the old one, so I separated the histories. Cena rium  Talk  03:16, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep; put this MfD on some sort of "perennial proposals" list. Ling.Nut (WP:3IAR) 03:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I would speedy keep this myself under SNOW, but I just can't be fucked.  Dei z  talk 05:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep: Per Ned. - NeutralHomer  •  Talk  08:37, 5 September 2008 (UTC) (doesn't give a fuck)
 * Keep. Essay about editing wikipedia belongs.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. this stirs the blood in me. not to give a fuck and not to give a damn -- the article itself is really not offending nor disgusting.. at the end of the article, i realized that the word fuck in cyberworld is not really a first-degree sin.. the real fuck here is having sides in your neutrality. Axxand    SPEAK    ACT  12:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.