Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't-give-a-fuckism (3rd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Snowball keep Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 23:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Don't-give-a-fuckism
For a website that already struggles someone to achieve and maintain credibility, this page certainly doesn't help the cause. It makes the site look like a joke - and that is does not take itself seriously. It is kind of appalling that this page is allowed to stay when Wikipedia is trying to make itself into a credible source for information on the Internet. Alex (talk) 21:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Go get fired up about something that matters. Wikipedia will be less of a joke and more credible when actual issues of concern are addressed. This doesn't even make the list. Lara  21:48, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment This page doesn't help anything. Please explain to me why this page should be kept. This page offers nothing of any substance to this website.Alex (talk) 21:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It doesn't hurt anything either. This page, however, hurts morale. Thanks for bringing down the unpaid troops. ;) Lara  22:35, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep – I highly doubt that many readers flock to Wikipedia and first see this humorous essay. Unless the nom wishes to go an a humorous-essay-deletion-spree which others have already failed to accomplish. –MuZemike 21:54, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as MuZemike said, i doubt that users come here to see this essay. I didn't know that it existed until a few weeks ago, it's not harming anyone, and it's a single page... Pilif12p : Yo  21:59, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep What is the point of this discussion, exactly? What is it gaining anyone?  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 22:00, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Do not give a fuck about this nomination. Keep. Ironholds (talk) 22:35, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:DGAF. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 22:37, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: What Lara said above. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:40, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per WP:SNOW. WP is not censored.  Grow up.  The essay is clearly encouraging a zen-like attitude towards editing.  Just because it uses the word "fuck" 22 times is not a reason to delete it.  Perhaps if you practiced don't-give-a-fuckism a little more, you wouldn't have let your emotional response to the word "fuck" compel you to nominate this page for deletion.    Snotty Wong   gossip 22:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Being a hypothetical source of embarrassment is not a valid deletion reason. Though I agree with Lara, something like this doesn't even make the list of things that could cost us credibility. Mr.Z-man 22:59, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per all the above keeps - I "struggle someone" to follow the nom, and I think "is does take itself" too seriously - I'd comment further, but cba. Nortonius (talk) 22:59, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.