Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't-give-a-fuckism (5th nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. (NAC) Armbrust The Homunculus 11:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Don't-give-a-fuckism
Previous AfDs for this article: 
 * Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't-give-a-fuckism
 * Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't-give-a-fuckism (second nomination)
 * Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't-give-a-fuckism (3rd nomination)
 * Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't-give-a-fuckism (4th nomination)

I understand that this page has been nominated for deletion several times. Well, so I shall make my point clear.

Yes, Wikipedia is not censored, and I agree to this rule, and I also edit and translate articles that contain explicit material. However, please refer to this page. "However, words and images that can be considered offensive should not be included unless they are treated in an encyclopedic manner."

There was not a need to use vulgarities just to explain a point. Since this is not a joke and a humourous essay may contain advice, such essays should be written in a "fine" manner. Since it is also an essay on civility, why is the content not civilised enough? "Not censored" does not give special favor to offensive content.

Humourous essays are meant to make Wikipedians have a good laugh, and at the same time learn something about what should be observed on Wikipedia. Huang (talk in public in private &#124; contribs) 13:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong and speedy keep This nomination is clearly bad faith, and offensive in its own right ES  &#38;L  13:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * How is this bad faith, all I see is you refusing to assume good faith. TeleComNasSprVen (talk &bull; contribs) 03:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Offensive material, from which you quoted, is a content guideline, which only applies to articles. Mr.Z-man 16:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - page is unfunny. --Surturz (talk) 04:12, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * That's not a reason to delete. Signed Obvious Guy, aka, Ego White Tray (talk) 04:26, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, your lack of a sense of humour is not the essay's fault :-) ES  &#38;L  11:08, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Same as previously. It has a project-related educational purpose. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:55, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, no valid reason for deletion. Stifle (talk) 12:50, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * DGAF ~ benzband  ( talk ) 17:23, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. You're welcome to propose changing the name to s/fuck/damn/ or similar on the talk page. Deletion is not a substitute for renaming. (Not saying that "damn" is completely inoffensive.) Besides professing his butthurt sensibility about the title, the nominator has not brought any arguments as to why the content is otherwise unsuitable. Someone not using his real name (talk) 03:36, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Someone, qualifying the nominator's sensibility as "butthurt" is really uncalled for. benzband  ( talk ) 16:30, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep and TROUTing of the nominator on the grounds that the basis of this nomination is a page that is only intended to apply to articles and not other Wikipedia essays, guidelines, or policies. Technical 13 (talk) 02:40, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't give a fuck if you Keep this. ;) Basically echoing what Mr.Z-man said. -- Vandalism destroyer  02:47, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per G10. blastertalk! see 09:41, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 2 issues there. Number 1: there's no planet where this is an attack page.  Number 2: regardless of number 1, it's obviously a contested CSD, and thus would not be nom'd as one  ES  &#38;L  10:17, 26 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete under WP:IAR. Redirect to Main page. TeleComNasSprVen (talk &bull; contribs) 02:59, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.