Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't dive thinking that the referee won't notice

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  userfy to User:تنعيم ٩/Don't dive thinking that the referee won't notice. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 05:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Don't dive thinking that the referee won't notice

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

I'm not sure this is something we need; I'm not even sure this is something I understand, and I don't see how this is really relevant to Wikipedia editing. The basic setup is already difficult: what does diving have to do with whether you tackled someone earlier on or not? Drmies (talk) 20:03, 8 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Userfy - This essay appears to use faking a foul in association football as some sort of metaphor for civil behaviour, but the essay is incomprehensible. The author an have it as a user subpage. -- Whpq (talk) 12:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Userfy pending an explanation from the originator. As User:Whpq says, this is about association football, but, as Whpq says, is incomprehensible.  It is about a player who fouled an opponent and got it away with it, and then fakes having been fouled by the same opponent to try to get them given a yellow card, when the offenses were not their fault.  So the topic is a player who is repeatedly playing unfairly.  It isn't clear what this has to do with Wikipedia, or with disruptive editors.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.