Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Droconner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was  Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 23:48, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Droconner
Not enough content to determine whether it would be a valid project page, and it seems to be abandoned — Snigbrook 19:54, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Wait - weak keep At all of seven weeks, it is possible that this is too soon to call anything "abandoned." Collect (talk) 21:25, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak delete or move to a user subpage. Hard to say whether there is a valid wikiproject that could be based on this (not enough info to identify what is being meant by the "Melville story project"). As something that is clearly Wikipedia-related, this would be perfectly fine as a user subpage, even if it is not edited there for a few months. However, the page is in Wikipedia mainspace where pages need to be in more developed and identifiable state than this one. Moreover, the page title is really confusing (I first thought it was a userpage), since Droconner is the name of a user, User:Droconner and as such is not really an appropriate name for a Wikiproject page in Wikipedia namespace. Nsk92 (talk) 22:57, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Move to userspace. It's possible the user returns, so I'd like to give them time to work on it in the privacy of their own userspace. - Mgm|(talk) 13:16, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. If there were actually any content here, I'd be recommending a move too, but it's not as though the six words "Project Page for Melville story project" are going to be that hard to recreate if the user returns to finish... whatever this was going to be. Preserving works in progress is an admirable goal, but it only makes sense when there's actually been some progress in the work. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 11:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Zetawoof. Of course, if the user returns to the page, there's no problem with it being taken up again. Stifle (talk) 14:24, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * In principal I would move to userspace, but given it is six words i'd use common sense and delete. Rambo's Revenge (talk)  18:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. bd2412  T 05:59, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Symbol delete vote.svgDelete Apparrent attempt by user to claim a page in each namespace.--Ipatrol (talk) 18:36, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.