Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Editor of the Year

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete - if you want the content, as me or anyone in Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles; but I'm not going to userfy content to someone unless they ask for it. Wily D 08:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Editor of the Year


Unethical with wikipedia's philosophy and produced without consensus by a two month old account. Plus we've only just started the year and so nobody can win for a long while.  Rcsprinter  (articulate)  @ 16:15, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: I believe nominator may mean "contrary to" rather than "unethical with". Regarding which, Barnstars and multiple "Awesome Wikipedian" pages run by several editors, including the much-beloved and missed Phaedrial, have not been found to harm the encyclopedia in any way. If the account is inactive, we can assume the page is also, and mark it so without deletion. If the account is active, try talking to them. Killer Chihuahua  16:21, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * delete. At best, a waste of space. At worst, provocative and divisive. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Did you really just MfD the first thing a new and apparently young editor did after requesting adoption from you? Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 18:55, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I would disagree with SamuelTheGhost as the idea has potential. However this is so incomplete, that it should be userfied until fuller developed. If this concept should exist it would be better to discuss it first at the village pump. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm usually the type of person that can find the worst in anyone's motives, but I'm not really seeing what is so bad about this creation. Tarc (talk) 20:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Should this have to go please read it as encumbent that the subpage EOTY/sign up also be dispensed with in an appropriate fashion. Hasteur (talk) 22:26, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Userfy It's an interesting idea on the face of it, but so nascent that it would do with some incubation to refine the idea. Hasteur (talk) 22:28, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete or userfy as inadequately prepared for project space, and lacking support. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:47, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I can't see anything worth userfying, after all there's nothing to stop the user working on a new idea if he/she wants to. -- Klein zach  11:41, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.