Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Editor review/User page design center

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Speedy delete per G2. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 23:15, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Editor review/User page design center
Not an editor review. I think it's an attempt at an article, but how it ended up in editor review mystifies me. cymru lass (hit me up)⁄(background check) 21:56, 28 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Wow. Definitely doesn't belong there. No idea how that mistake could have been made.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 22:03, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Weirdest mistake I'm seen... Derild  49  21  Review Me!  21:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.