Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Edits Per Day


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

Now that is is better, I am withdawing. I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 19:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Edits Per Day
Encourages blatant editcountitis; it even says that if you have less than 50 edits a dayyou should take a wikibreak. For the record I average around that each day but it recommends the EPD being "relatively high - over 500." Take this statement too: "[EPD] should also be a key factor in supporting/rejecting an RfA candidate." Normally I would let such essay pages go, but when these judge on quantity not quality of edits, I simply must step in. I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 00:01, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This page seems unecessary. It seems to encourage editcountis and has a certain time to try WP:RFA. Users should run when ready, not at a specific time. -- RyRy5  ( talk  ♠  Review ) 00:17, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This was actually a test to see if I could create a page without it getting deleted for more than 3 days The test worked I wonder how it got found out. Anyways I don't really believe in any of that Get deleting,really.:)Xp54321 (talk) 01:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete In actual fact, I copy edited this, but didn't create the essay. The thing itself is very weak, and I can't see that it has a lot of merit so would be fine with removing it.(olive (talk) 02:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC))
 * Delete - Encourages editcountitis, this is not the way to go when judging whether to support at RfA. Also, the original creator has recommended deletion above.  RichardΩ612  Ɣ |ɸ 05:49, May 16, 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Bah, seriously... Anyone thinking this is serious definitely needs a clue stick. 5000 edits per day for admins hopefuls? I see this essay as sarcasm against people having serious editcountitis issues. -- lucasbfr  talk 06:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Editcountitis Ok, someone tells me I might be too sarcastic and this page could be serious. Sooo let's do it this way ;) -- lucasbfr  talk 06:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Make very clear it's only humour or Delete. I was also thinking of tagging it as "humor" and expanding it, as soon as it's very very clear that it's only humour, see my edits. Editcountitis has a totally different topic, I don't think we can merge anything there --Enric Naval (talk) 09:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * This version is indeed much better :) -- lucasbfr  talk 16:56, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.