Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Feature all Vital Articles

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Feature all Vital Articles


Doesn't look as though this page was ever used, and its sole contributor hasn't edited since May 2012. Steel1943 (talk) 22:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, clearly unused and redundant to other task forces. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Userfy for User:S8333631, tagged historical, even if never used. It was obviously a good faith intention, possibly a good idea, and there is no obvious reason S8333631 should not be allowed to resume working on it.  Yes, S8333631 should be advised to look at similar task forces first.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.