Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Featured Article Candidates for Deletion

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Snow keep. (NAC) Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0  21:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Featured Article Candidates for Deletion


This serves no real purpose. Being at FAC and AfD at the same time is so rare that having a dedicated page for deletion tracking, and one that's not automated (and therefore likely to be forgotten before the next time this happens) makes little sense.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  15:25, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep as a humor page. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:38, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Mark, who has already any cause for bitching. Br&#39;er Rabbit (talk) 17:53, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * keep, no harm and contains a sufficient level of humour. Frietjes (talk) 18:05, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Perhaps there is a bit of humor in this, but it also illustrates the diversity of our project in no uncertain terms.  While there are those who view an article as something we wish to showcase as our best work, there are others who view an entire topic matter as un-encyclopedic and unsuitable for inclusion.  If nothing else, it's a footnote in the history of a project which embarrasses such polar opposite viewpoints; and as such is worthy of documentation. Chedzilla (talk) 19:02, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: Absolutely hilarious!   Montanabw (talk) 20:08, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment "Hilarious" is an argument to avoid in deletion discussions. Inter  change  able  20:20, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, for Afd, but WP:ITSFUNNY specifically exempts Wikipedia-space pages. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:30, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep The fact that there is on or more items in this list indicates a significant tension in Wikipedia processes, which should be recorded in some way, and this page is the logical place. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:15, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. Statυs  (talk) 03:20, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep It is a good record such occurences, humourous, and informative. WP:ILIKEIT -- Gilderien Chat&#124;List of good deeds 20:23, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - the "real purpose" is documenting that some articles have been simultaneously nominated for completely opposite processes, and there's nothing at all wrong with that. Lady  of  Shalott  01:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep as a humour page as noted above. Documenting the irony of an article being nominated for opposite things (good enough to be a featured article candidate, but also not sufficient to be included here) strikes me as a good use of a page.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 02:51, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I can see some use in it. YE  Pacific   Hurricane  19:55, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.