Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Glossary

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  keep. History merge performed several days ago to address the issue.  Mae din\ talk 12:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Glossary
I created this page last week, but according to User:Papa Lima Whiskey it's a violation of the GFDL. If so, probably should be deleted. jjron (talk) 14:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * WTF. This is a non-sense POINTy MfD. Please retract or speedy close. Unecessary drama. --Dschwen 16:07, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I see a history merge has been performed. Well, everybody can see by themselves how "similar" the two glossaries were. --Dschwen 21:16, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Permitted use in userspace.  Find something which needs deletion . Collect (talk) 13:54, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:Copyrights violation is not a good reason for deletion unless it is impossible to insert the required attribution now.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:51, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.