Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Fixtures Group

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Note that if this were an article (and moved to the proper space) it would be deletable under db-corp. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:06, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Fixtures Group


Looks like a misplaced article. It doesn't contain any reliable secondary sources, and it would qualify for WP:G13 if it had been submitted through articles for creation. I couldn't find any sources online, but my search was not helped by the very generic name of the company. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 06:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * It is an interesting history of the small company, worthy of being written down, but see Alternative outlets. It would go well on the company website. As a Wikipedia article, it reads as promotion (not independent third party coverage) and it fails WP:CORP. I see also that the user has engaged in some link spamming, although not agregiously. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.