Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Forking isn't as harmful as we think

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Forking isn't as harmful as we think


A confusing essay that advocates breaching Content forking written by an indefed user, and mostly untouched since 2012. TheDragonFire (talk) 08:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Userfy for the blocked user. Not fully baked. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. IF the user is unblocked and IF they ask for it, they can ask for a WP:REFUND. --Calton | Talk 04:52, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Personal opinion piece that is indeed confusing and serves no purpose. No need to keep around indefinitely. --  P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:16, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.