Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Wiggles Pty Ltd/1

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT as no valid reason to delete this page was presented (and there is also no chance this nomination is successful). (non-admin closure) Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 20:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Wiggles Pty Ltd/1

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Invalid reasoned-GAR GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep, no reason to delete. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 18:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete, agree that this was invalid. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep no reason to delete. Many invalid GARs have been opened before, just like how there have been many non-starter GA and FA nominations. &#126;~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Proposal withdrawn and speedy keep Turns out there's no need to delete as many invalid GARs, GANs and FANs have been opened before, most staying on the website. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.