Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Grow a pair

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:18, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

GROWAPAIR


Essay clutter, non-useful, title is somewhat offensive. Neutralitytalk 07:41, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just plain stupid. --Anthem 10:49, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. As mentioned elsewhere, essays are windows into the minds of Wikipedians.  This essay may be amazingly blunt, but the opinion is no less valid.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:22, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It's a one-sentence microstub. It's not even an "essay" in that it explicates no particular argument. It is pure clutter and not useful to the project. Neutralitytalk 19:10, 29 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per . ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  Not-content  ─╢ 21:56, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only a dozen words — just clutter. -- Klein zach  01:18, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. A throwaway offensive and incoherent thought that was never developed upon. Essays should give advice or explanation; this does neither. Fences  &amp;  Windows  19:40, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete The only "use" I can see for this page is to link to it in a conflict (ie. "You don't want to do it my way? Well, WP:GROWAPAIR!"). It just doesn't seem to have any constructive purpose. --  E♴  (talk)  23:34, 30 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.