Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Guide for Indymedia authors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Withdraw deletion request as nom. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 19:36, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Guide for Indymedia authors
This page contains misleading information that contradicts Wikipedia content polices including WP:NOR, WP:V, and WP:NOT ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 15:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 15:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep seems like a good faith effort to help people interesting in contributing to Wikipedia learn how to do so effectively. If this misrepresents policy in its explanations, then it should be corrected, not deleted... but at a glance it seems basically accurate. Overall I find your nomination unclear, though... why would we delete sometime just because it had some errors in a particular revision? There needs to be fundamental problems with a page. --W.marsh 18:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I see your point, but the problem with the page is that it fundamentally contradicts content policies. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 19:33, 2 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I will withdraw the deletion request and fix the page instead. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 19:34, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.