Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:If you've done the research, notability is null

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:If you've done the research, notability is null

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

"Essay" page in project space: (The redirect WP:NOTENULL should also be deleted at the same time.) Alsee (talk) 02:26, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * No content beyond the nutshell template.
 * No content hidden in page history.
 * The sole author has been blocked for 6 years.
 * There are no meaningful incoming links to the page itself nor to the redirect.
 * I tried to check pageview statistics, but it doesn't even return a result. The absence of meaningful inbound links rules out meaningful pageviews anyway.
 * SPEEDY WP:G5 This was created by a sock of user:TZLNCTV while TZLNCTV was indef'ed. Aside from the issues listed by the OP this might also be a Speedy WP:G3 as "obvious misinformation" We don't accept that a topic is notable simply because the article contains sources. Note that the title is the opposite of the actual meaning. Meters (talk) 02:46, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or Speedy Delete Robert McClenon (talk) 04:15, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.