Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Iliad

Closing instructions 
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was userfy.--Aervanath (talk) 18:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Iliad
I'm struggling to think of a purpose for this page. It's not funny, it's almost completely orphaned, and it's just a bit odd. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► ballotbox ─╢ 16:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * It looks like an attempt to coin a jargon term. It obviously hasn't caught on, but it might be worth asking the author (who is still highly active) if he'd like it userfied. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 17:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll direct him to this page. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► stannator ─╢ 17:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Userfy and it does have some promise -- the "long pages" are not a badge of honour for WP. (I have pruned several now) Collect (talk) 19:28, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy. Challenged single-authored essays should be userfied.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.