Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Intensive Care Unit/UBX


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Delete after substitution. I don't see a problem to keep the code and design on the archived project page. Tikiwont (talk) 09:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Intensive Care Unit/UBX
Also listing User:UBX/WICU. WP:WICU was closed at the end of December. I see no reason for a user to say that they're a member of a now-unused project. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:48, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Unscented (talk) 18:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Question I don't know the precedent for templates being used in relation to pages marked as historical, but I'd like to know if I can subst these templates on Wikipedia:Intensive Care Unit so that the code remains. If that would break MfD rules, I ask the closing administrator to do so if the consensus is delete. Revelian (talk) 21:02, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - TPH, please be careful with marking transcluded pages for deletion! The MfD message turned op on a number of user pages (you should use md1-inline for transclusions). Grutness...wha?  23:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.