Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Legal Debate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Usefy (moved to User:Chart123/Wikipedia:Legal Debate). Ruslik (talk) 11:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Legal Debate
Orphaned, uncategorized page for a proposal which hasn't been edited since 2006, created by a user who is long since inactive, and whose content has largely been superseded by WikiProject Law. --  Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 10:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing worth saving, just a failed proposal. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 01:54, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete a useless page that is going nowhere, we would be better off with out this. If the user came back and wanted it back they could have it userfied. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy - the content doesn't violate any policies, but is more appropriate for userspace, where half-finished ideas can linger indefinitely. It's thoroughly inappropriate for the Wikipedia namespace in its current state. Graham 87 02:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy save a step. And many "failed proposals" later seem to reappear, to be sure. Collect (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.