Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Lies Miss Snodgrass Told You

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) L3X1 My Complaint Desk 02:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Lies Miss Snodgrass Told You


This "essay" directly defies MOS:POSS, isn't even funny (except a bogus hamlet quote), contains unhelpful opinion, and probably offends many of the SnodGrasses of the world. I tried G1 but was recommended MfD. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 00:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep, but probably userfy. As essays go, this one is pretty trivial, and maybe a little WP:POINTy, but it's really just an elaboration on WP:IAR, and certainly not a threat to the Wiki. --Tryptofish (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep and trout L3X1 for being so easily offended by something so trivial and easily-recognized as a humorous reflection on a core policy (WP:IAR). Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * LOL. I'm not a Snodgrass, but I am dead serious about the mis-info on the page. I'm cool with the trout, see my talk page topicon. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 00:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's an essay that points out common misconceptions. It could be quite useful. SarahSV (talk) 00:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:IAR. BTW no one is being forced to read it. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 00:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - It makes it clear that it's an essay. "Funny" is, as Shakespeare didn't say, in the eye of the beholder, and if anyone is genuinely offended by this light-hearted page then I'd be very surprised. Exemplo347 (talk) 01:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * But it should have joke stamped on the top, as it is, I have no doubt someone will sooner than later try to hold it up over Policy. See my talk page. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 01:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * No, it should not be labeled a joke, because it's certainly not a joke, even if it's presented in a lighthearted vein. In particular, the list of Grammar and Usage Hobbyhorses is a completely serious list of wrongheaded non-rule "rules" perennially pushed on the project by autodidacts and the semi-educated. There's a long thread on your talk page about your wrongheaded templating and XfD nominations. Start paying attention.  E Eng  01:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep because the nominator doesn't apparently know what a hobbyhorse is, and so has read the entire page backwards, as well explained by several people above.  E Eng  01:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, it learned me real good telling me what some elderly teacher taught them. You can tell they loved her. Randy Kryn 02:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.