Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Lies Miss Snodgrass told you

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Clyde  &#91;trout needed&#93; 22:03, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Lies Miss Snodgrass told you

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Complete Blasphemy & Completely Unsourced 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (talk) 21:06, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, no valid deletion reason supplied. This is unproblematic as an essay and helpful as a guide to writing style. If this were from a new user rather than one who has been here six months, I'd just revert the nomination as vandalism. As it is, it seems to be a WP:POINTy response to a comment at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep &mdash; no valid rationale for deletion has been supplied. The page is fine. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 21:31, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep indeed. Bduke (talk) 22:01, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.