Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of Wikipedia vandals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy close deleted by  Computerjoe 's talk  22:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

List of Wikipedia vandals
Creating a vandal hall of fame is a bad idea, please see WP:DENY for a rationale. Please use WP:AIV or WP:AN/I for reporting vandalism instead. In any case, the relevant information is already archived in the revision history of WP:AIV, the edit histories of the various antivandal bots, and the block logs. -- The Anome 16:05, 18 November 2006 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedia_vandals&action=submit Editing Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of Wikipedia vandals (section) - Preview - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia(UTC)


 * Delete. Per nom basically. -- Majorly ( Talk ) 16:14, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wow. It's both useless, as it will never list every vandal, AND giving too much recognition to vandals. -Amarkov blahedits 16:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hey, look, you can be a vandal just by adding your name to this page! Gavia immer (u|t|c)  17:01, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 17:53, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: the page's creator has now blanked it, except for the MfD notice -- presumably this means that we can now speedy delete it per db-author? -- The Anome 20:19, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.