Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by Good Articles

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by Good Articles


This list requires editors to add themselves manually, and is so out of date that it is practically useless. It is probably misleading for anyone that actually wants to know the stats. To see how out of date it is compare User:GA bot/Stats which part of this list is based off. AIR corn (talk) 00:53, 1 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. I mostly agree with Aircorn; it failed its purpose.  → Call me  Razr   Nation  01:35, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Archive It should be retained for historical purposes. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 09:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Archive, but preferably update, repair the bot. A worthy list to keep alive. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:47, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't think anything is wrong with the bot, its job is not to update this list. The bot has its own list of all reviews done by everyone and this list just contains those with more than 50. I think originally meant to keep manually updating this list from the bots list. We could just transclude the bot list I suppose, but that would be very long and not solve the issue with updating the nominators as I don't think this is recorded by any bots. As well as not being updated regularly it is also not updated evenly. At the moment only some editors add themselves so it is very skewed as well as out of date. If it is kept I think someone would need to code a bot to auto populate it. AIR corn  (talk) 09:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per Aircorn. — Yellow Dingo&#160;(talk) 02:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.