Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was a unanimous delete. Greeves (talk • contribs) 02:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

List of Wikipedians by culture


This nomination also includes the following related pages:
 * – list of 12 users; redundant to Category:Wikipedians in Asia (36+ subcategories)
 * – list of 6 users; redundant to Category:Wikipedians in Brazil (11+ subcategories, 200+ users)
 * – list of 14 users; redundant to Category:Wikipedians in Canada (20+ subcategories)
 * – list of 2 users; redundant to Category:Wikipedians in Latin America (18+ subcategories)
 * – list of 44 users; redundant to Category:Wikipedians in Europe (49+ subcategories)
 * – empty page that directs users to Wikipedians Old Europe
 * – list of 22 users; redundant to Category:Wikipedians in North America (1000s of users)
 * – list of 1 user; redundant to Category:Latino/Hispanic Wikipedians (15+ subcategories)

All of the pages included in this nomination are unmaintained, hopelessly incomplete, and redundant and inferior to their corresponding categories. At most, the lists serve as a distraction for less experienced editors and create confusion regarding the appropriateness of lists and categories in different circumstances. Delete all. Black Falcon (Talk) 04:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

(Note: Deletion discussions concerning similar pages can be found here and here)


 * Delete; yes, this is what categories are for. ~ PseudoSudo 07:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all redundant to categories and unused. Hut 8.5 13:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete though this should have gone to cfd instead.-- Sef rin gle Talk 16:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * They are in essence the equivalent of categories, but I doubt CfD would have accepted discussion of any page outside of the "Category:" namespace. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 18:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete these; there really isn't any useful info here that isn't in the cats. — The Storm Surfer 22:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.