Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of disambiguation types


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 01:53, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

List of disambiguation types
Folks, nobody will break down the dab, and that people removed most items from this list, because of that it is now a substub.
 * Delete per neglegence to break down the disambiguation category. --Nintendude 22:01, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Not an article, so moved to Miscellany for deletion. BD2412  T 02:43, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * See this old version; several users have been trying to break down the dab. I personally think they're crazy but harmless, and have been doing my best to ignore them.  A list of these templates should be kept around somewhere in case someone wants to make things sane again.  Weak keep. &mdash;Cryptic (talk)
 * Keep–This article clarifies Manual of Style (disambiguation pages), and makes it crystal clear exactly which dab templates are permitted, and that no others are permitted.&mdash;GraemeMcRaetalk 06:07, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Even without saying that this article is an attempt to impose an unjustified restriction, it is redundant, since the "list" has only three items. No need for a separate page. mikka (t) 03:38, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Unnecessary Instruction creep and redundant with Manual of Style (disambiguation pages). older&ne;wiser 17:06, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete outdated. -- User:Docu


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.