Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of editors who tested Wikipedia to make a point outside Wikipedia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was The result was merged/deleted by the sole author. `'Míkka>t 21:13, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

List of editors who tested Wikipedia to make a point outside Wikipedia
I'm not sure what to make of this page. It lists one journalist who vandalized Wikipedia, one journalist who may have edited Wikipedia, and one guy who claims to have made an article and later reported on its speedy deletion. This page implies that these edits were made for "various ulterior motives" and that these edits were made in order to make a point. As many people probably know, we do have a similar page at Editing of Wikipedia by the media; however, that page does not (at least obviously) attempt to synthesize the provided sources in order to advance a position. --- RockMFR 18:09, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * merge if appropriate to Editing of Wikipedia by the media. The title of this feel a bit it WP:POINT. --Salix alba (talk) 20:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge/delete. I was not aware if the page Editing of Wikipedia by the media. I admit the title is clumsy and unnecessarily narrow. `'Míkka>t 20:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.