Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of youtubers that give content warnings for epilepsy sufferers

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. The user who created the draft does not appear to have used anything from other contributors, so a history merge is not required for copyright compliance. RL0919 (talk) 05:30, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:List of youtubers that give content warnings for epilepsy sufferers

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Delete. Not a topic for WP. and in any case not verified in articles Smerus (talk) 17:05, 4 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete We are not a WP:WEBHOST (JayPlaysStuff &#124; talk to me &#124; What I've been up to) 20:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Move to draftspace or userspace It's an attempt at an article, just in the wrong namespace. Pawnkingthree (talk) 21:16, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify - Possibly worth keeping but not as an article.--WaltCip- (talk)  21:49, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Userfy: It could be the beginning of content suitable for mainspace somewhere. Do not Draftify, as it is not on a pathway to being an article.  As it does not speak to Wikipedia and epilepsy intersection issues, it does not belong in projectspace. SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:10, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftspace is not restricted to article content, as it notes in WP:Drafts . Since this has multiple authors and one of them tried to move it to draftspace via a cut and paste move draftification seems the best option to me. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 04:31, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Very rarely, and generally a bad idea, and a bad idea here. This is not suitable for Wikipedia. Changing !vote to Delete. The editors involved need the clear message. Fails WP:NOR. SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:08, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Userfy as per SmokeyJoe. Is userfy a Wikipedia jargon term (as draftify is)?  Robert McClenon (talk) 17:33, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:USERFY
 * — SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:52, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * History merge into Draft:List of youtubers that give content warnings for epilepsy sufferers to repair a cut and paste move, then leave the resulting page in draft space. One of the people working on this seems to have realised that it was meant to be in draft space, but they cut and paste moved it rather than using the pagemove functionality. This needs history merging into the draft to restore attribution to the other account, then it should be left in draftspace as a misplaced draft. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 04:27, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTDIR as this would fall under "repositories of loosely associated topics". I mean... should we also make a list of Youtubers who give warnings for mature content? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 05:01, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Likely not notable, wrong namespace, and reliable secondary sources would be hard to find, if they exist at all. Also, AFAIK, its usually spelt YouTubers, not youtubers, and sufferers is poor word choice to say the least. MxYamato (talk) 10:49, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP is not an indiscriminate collection of information. I can't think of how this would be on-topic for the WP namespace either. weeklyd3  (message me | my contributions) 19:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per weeklyd3.  starship .paint  (exalt) 03:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. The page detracts from the purpose of Wikipedia. AKK  700  15:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge with Draft:List of youtubers that give content warnings for epilepsy sufferers, per that IP. Wrong namespace, and we don't delete drafts for being unsourced, so it's fine to just keep it as a draft. — PerfectSoundWhatever  (t; c) 22:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Its never going to be article though so what's the point in doing so? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 05:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Just to second the point made by Knowledgekid87 - this is just inappropriate for a WP article, to draftify it is to suggest, against all WP principles, that it is, or ever could be, an appopriate topic for WP.--Smerus (talk) 18:28, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.